The Development of Distributed Expertise Across Physical and Virtual Worlds in a Teen Gaming Club |
|
With the growing popularity of online games, discussions about their educational value have been initiated among researchers, practitioners, and policy makers (Glazer, 2006). There is an increased need to more fully understand these complex communities as promising models for learning and literacy (Gee, 2003). Though learning to participate in any of these multiplayer game communities can be quite overwhelming and confusing, there are only few studies of how newcomers get access to insider knowledge (Steinkuehler, 2006) and develop expertise within the gaming community (Squire, under review). When we started studying an after-school club where twenty-one 9–12 year olds came regularly to play in a teen virtual world called Whyville, we were intrigued with the ways that they helped each other to navigate the geographical intricacies of the site and how the participants subsequently appeared to become peer teachers in their own right (Ching & Kafai, in press). In addition, it became clear that learning took place in both online and offline locations as well as between club members and other players within the larger world of Whyville. Gee (2004) argues that in affinity spaces, such as gaming communities, specialized knowledge is developed and distributed amongst participants in the space. With this in mind, we set out to study trajectories of expertise or specialized knowledge (Barron, 2006) amongst the youth of the club in two contexts. First, we analyzed how they found out about a secret command that could only be learned from other people (either online or offline). This was a very specific way to explore learning and teaching across online/offline contexts. Second, we investigated how peer-teaching strategies developed over time, using case studies to trace youth’s learning and teaching development in online and offline settings. Building on knowledge from the former analysis, this allowed us to form stories of how individuals developed specific expertise in socially valued areas over time.
Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human Development, 49, pp. 193–234. Ching, C. C., & Kafai, Y. B. (in press). Peer pedagogy: Student collaboration and reflection in a learning through design project. Teachers College Press. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York, NY: Routledge. Glazer, S. (2006). Video games: Do they educational value? Congressional Quarterly Researcher, 16(40), 937–960. Leander, K. M., & McKim, K. K. (2003). Tracing the everyday ‘sitings’ of adolescents on the Internet: A strategic adaptation of ethnography across online and offline spaces. Education, Communication, Information, 3(2), 211–240. Squire, K. (Under review). Open-ended video games: A model for developing learning for the interactive age. Paper under consideration for Salen, K. (Ed.), MacArthur Series on Digital Learning. Steinkuehler, C. A. (2006). Massively multiplayer online video gaming as participation in a discourse. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 13(1), 38–52. |